Recent rumors suggest that Splash Mountain, the last remaining version at Tokyo Disneyland, may soon close its doors. This follows the well-publicized replacements of similar attractions in the United States, where both Walt Disney World and Disneyland Park replaced their versions with Tiana’s Bayou Adventure, themed to The Princess and the Frog (2009).
The closure of Splash Mountain in Japan raises questions about audience engagement; while the U.S. audience expressed strong emotions about the ride’s fate, it appears that the Japanese audience has a different perspective, viewing the attraction as a whimsical experience rather than a controversial relic.
Rumors Surrounding Tokyo Disneyland Splash Mountain
Confirmations about a potential closure are still pending.
However, conversations within the Disney community indicate that the Oriental Land Company (OLC), which operates Tokyo Disneyland, may engage in discussions regarding a replacement.
Notably, the audience at Tokyo Disneyland appears to connect more with familiar characters like Donald Duck and Bambi than with the narrative of The Princess and the Frog, leading to speculation about the future of the ride:
It brings me no joy in “breaking” this horrible scoop, but two very trustworthy friends with direct sources within WDI have confirmed that they are actively designing a replacement for Splash Mountain and Critter Country in Tokyo.
It doesn’t matter to Bob Iger that it is the most popular ride at the Resort. It doesn’t matter to Bob Iger that Japanese fans LOVE the characters, theming, and music. It doesn’t matter to Bob Iger that the retheme in Florida has had the worst reception out of any recent Disney Parks project.
Disney will “force” OLC to accept it using a handful of potential ultimatums. These range from pulling song licensing to holding back on developing unrelated future attractions. I’ve also heard rumblings that they might threat to pull Disney licensing altogether, but I’m not sure if they can legally do that or not.
https://twitter.com/BrerOswald/status/1835817800952324422
The Role of Oriental Land Company (OLC)
The Oriental Land Company holds ownership of Tokyo Disneyland and operates under a license from The Walt Disney Company. This unique arrangement complicates negotiations related to the closure of assets like Splash Mountain.
Disney’s relationship with OLC has historically been collaborative, yet the decision surrounding the fate of the last Splash Mountain is believed to hinge significantly on audience preferences in Japan.
The challenge lies in convincing OLC to replace a popular attraction, particularly when local sentiments may not resonate with the themes associated with The Princess and the Frog. While discussions about the attraction’s potential replacement have reportedly taken place, OLC’s commitment to catering to their audience’s tastes remains a crucial factor in any future decisions.
Speculations on Replacement Attractions
As rumors circulate about the closure of Splash Mountain, speculation on what may replace it is generating interest. Disney Imagineers are rumored to be actively designing a unique attraction that fits the cultural context and aesthetic of Tokyo Disneyland. Given the success of franchises like Frozen and Chip & Dale in Japan, these may serve as strong candidates for potential themes.
Both Pocahontas and Bambi have seen increased representation in merchandise and park events, suggesting a possible shift towards these characters in the new attraction.
Additionally, the creative direction taken by Disney Imagineers is expected to play a significant role in shaping the future of the park’s offerings, though specific details remain closely guarded.
Mixed reactions from Splash Mountain fans have emerged in response to the rumors of its closure. Many long-time supporters have expressed disappointment at the prospect of losing an iconic attraction, while others recognize the need for progression in theme park experiences. The broader implications for Disney’s reputation in international markets also require consideration.
The ongoing changes in Disney Parks worldwide may lead to perceptions of inconsistency. Fans are encouraged to visit Tokyo Disneyland soon, as the opportunity to experience the last remaining Splash Mountain could be fleeting.
The relationship between Disney and its international parks typically maintains a focus on shared goals; however, the nature of audience preferences in these markets calls for a nuanced approach to attraction development and retention.
Yes strong emotions were expressed in the US regarding the closure of Splash Mountain but Disney did not listen to public opinion and went ahead anyway. 20,000 people signed a petition to retheme Splash whereas 100,000 signed a petition to keep it as it was. Now Disney is forcing closure of the last Splash Mountain and it will be more unpopular than the previous closures. Iger has lost the plot