Menu

These 7 Plot Holes Are Begging for a Fix in the ‘Harry Potter’ Reboot

A scene from "Harry Potter" wearing round glasses and a scar on his forehead, standing amidst the misty backdrop of castle. The movie title, "Harry Potter," is prominently displayed.

Reboots tend to divide opinions, and Harry Potter is no exception.

Given that the original saga concluded just over a decade ago, many fans see the idea of a reboot as unnecessary, even sacrilegious. Still, Warner Bros. is pushing forward. A new TV adaptation is underway for HBO, set to revisit the magical world by tackling one book per season, with the first based on “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” slated for release in 2026, as per Deadline.

Harry Potter

Credit: Warner Bros.

With the original cast now well into their thirties, no one expects to see Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, or Rupert Grint return to their iconic roles. And while there’s always a slight chance of a cameo, it’s unlikely due to the ongoing friction between the actors and J.K. Rowling, the author and executive producer. Rowling’s controversial comments about gender identity and the transgender community have caused a rift (something Radcliffe recently described as “sad”), making any reunion improbable.

The reboot has sparked a fierce debate among fans. On one hand, the original films have a devoted following for a reason—it’s tough to imagine anyone else donning Harry’s glasses and scar.

'Harry Potter' characters lined up

Credit: Universal

On the other hand, the movies weren’t without their flaws. They omitted key details, leaving diehard fans unsatisfied in several areas. Admittedly, the filmmakers were at a disadvantage; they were making the films while the books were still coming out, meaning some details they thought were fine to abandon ended up being pretty crucial later on. With that in mind, the reboot holds some potential for redemption—if it can address the glaring inconsistencies from the original films.

Why Won’t Voldemort Use His Wand?

In “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,” there’s a pivotal moment when Harry and Voldemort’s wands connect due to sharing the same magical core—Fawkes’ phoenix feather. This connection triggers Priori Incantatem, a phenomenon that brings back the spirits of Voldemort’s most recent victims.

A pale, bald character in a dark robe is seated on a high-backed chair. The character has snake-like features and is raising their right hand with a dark, menacing expression, showing a wide, toothy smile. The background is dimly lit with a blue hue.

Credit: Warner Bros.

While this scene was depicted in the movie, there was no explanation about Priori Incantatem, leaving viewers confused. Voldemort’s decision to avoid using his own wand in later encounters, instead opting to borrow Lucius Malfoy’s, makes little sense without the backstory.

The reboot could finally provide the clarity that the original films overlooked, giving Voldemort’s actions more depth. As per the latest rumors, Jamie Campbell Bower – the actor best known for playing Vecna in Stranger Things – could very well be stepping into the role.

Where Did Harry’s Mirror Shard Come From?

Another puzzling moment happens in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (2011) when Harry looks into a shard of a mirror without any explanation. In the books, this fragment comes from a magical mirror given to Harry by his godfather, Sirius Black.

The mirror allowed Harry to communicate with Sirius, though he never used it until after Sirius’ death. This backstory is completely absent from the movies, leaving the inclusion of the mirror shard baffling and underdeveloped.

Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) crouches down and looks at Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe)

Credit: Warner Bros.

We always think that the films didn’t give Harry and Sirius’ relationship – especially its more toxic elements, with Sirius essentially seeing Harry as a reincarnation of his best friend – the attention it deserved, so hopefully the reboot has a chance will flesh this out further.

What Happened to Dobby?

Dobby, the beloved house elf, was barely featured in the original film series, despite playing significant roles in several of the books. While he made an appearance in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 (2010), his character was largely absent from the rest of the films.

Dobby in 'Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets'

Credit: Warner Bros.

In the books, Dobby is pivotal in several storylines, including helping Harry during the Triwizard Tournament and assisting in the formation of Dumbledore’s Army. His expanded presence throughout the books deepens his relationship with Harry, making his death far more impactful. Justice for Dobby.

Does Harry Ever Get His Wand Fixed?

One of the more jarring departures from the books occurs in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 when Harry snaps the Elder Wand and tosses it away instead of using it to repair his own broken wand.

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) looking shocked while holding wand

Credit: Warner Bros.

In the books, this moment is essential—Harry fixes his original wand, showing his desire to return to a normal life rather than wield ultimate power. This poignant detail was lost in the movie adaptation, leaving fans confused about why Harry would discard the Elder Wand without fixing his most trusted magical tool.

How Did Death Eaters Keep Finding Harry, Ron, and Hermione?

In both the books and films, Voldemort’s name carries fear. But in the books, his name is also magically taboo, meaning it triggers a spell that alerts Death Eaters whenever it’s spoken aloud. This is why they are able to find Harry, Ron, and Hermione after the trio escapes from Bill and Fleur’s wedding.

hermione granger, harry potter, and ron weasley looking shocked and upset

Credit: Warner Bros.

The original movies, however, never mention this enchantment, making the Death Eaters’ appearances seem more like random coincidences. The reboot could correct this oversight, providing a clearer explanation of how Voldemort’s forces track down the heroes so consistently.

Why Is Harry’s Patronus a Stag?

The stag Patronus holds significant meaning in Harry Potter’s life. It reflects his connection to his father, who was also an Animagus capable of transforming into a stag.

This connection is glossed over in the movies, robbing Harry’s Patronus of its emotional weight. The reboot could explore the Marauders’ backstory more thoroughly, explaining why Harry’s Patronus—and his father’s Animagus form—matters so deeply in his fight against dark forces.

What’s the Deal With Harry’s Mother’s Eyes?

As Harry often hears, he has his mother’s eyes. In the books, his green eyes are a defining trait, constantly reminding others, especially Snape, of his mother, Lily. However, the casting in the films muddled this key detail.

A young Lily Evans holds out her hand in 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2'

Credit: Warner Bros.

While Daniel Radcliffe has blue eyes, the actress portraying Lily (Ellie Darcey-Elden) has brown, leading to a noticeable inconsistency in this crucial narrative thread. Minutes after Snape utters, “You have your mother’s eyes,” we’re treated to a closeup of Lily’s decidedly not-blue eyes. The reboot could resolve this by ensuring more accurate casting and preserving the emotional resonance between Harry, Lily, and Snape (Alan Rickman).

With so many opportunities to correct past missteps, the Harry Potter reboot has the potential to finally deliver a version of the story that’s faithful to the books and satisfying for long-time fans.

Which plot holes are you most eager to see fixed in the new Harry Potter series?

About Chloe James

Chloë is a theme park addict and self-proclaimed novelty hunter. She's obsessed with all things Star Wars, loves roller coasters (but hates Pixar Pal-A-Round), and lives for Disney's next Muppets project.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.