Massive Plans Confirmed for ‘Harry Potter’ Anniversary, Movie Will Hit Theaters Next Year
The Wizarding World isn’t done casting spells on Hollywood. Warner Bros. has laid out an aggressive two-pronged plan that revives the franchise’s origins while preparing to relaunch it for a new generation. One move involves a return to theaters, the other a risky reboot on television.
It’s a strategy that could either cement the series as timeless or invite renewed scrutiny over whether the story has already been told too many times.
The announcements arrive at a complicated moment for the brand. Harry Potter remains one of the most profitable franchises in history, yet it has been shadowed in recent years by controversy around its creator and by doubts over how much more magic can be mined from Hogwarts.
Revisiting the Film That Started It All
Warner Bros. has confirmed that Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (2001) will return to cinemas in 2026 for its 25th anniversary. The studio says the release will anchor a year-long celebration that stretches across divisions.
“This anniversary not only celebrates the legacy of the original film but also introduces the magic to a new generation,” Warner Bros. Discovery Global Consumer Products group said (via Variety).
The move reopens the doors of Hogwarts to fans who first discovered it on the big screen, while also giving younger audiences — raised on streaming — the chance to see the story the way it was originally intended. When it debuted in 2001, the film quickly became a cultural event, grossing nearly $1 billion and laying the groundwork for one of cinema’s most lucrative sagas.
Casting a New Spell on HBO
At the same time, Warner Bros. is doubling down with a brand-new television adaptation. The project, currently in production for HBO and slated for release in 2027, will retell all seven books across multiple seasons.
New faces will take over some of the most famous roles in modern cinema. Dominic McLaughlin will play Harry Potter, Alastair Stout will portray Ron Weasley, and Arabella Stanton steps in as Hermione Granger. They’ll appear alongside John Lithgow as Dumbledore, Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape, Nick Frost as Hagrid, and Janet McTeer as Professor McGonagall.
The first season will mirror Rowling’s debut novel while restoring elements left out of the original film, such as Piers Polkiss and Charlie Weasley. The creative choice highlights HBO’s pitch for a more complete retelling, though early set photos have drawn criticism for looking too similar to the originals. Even Chris Columbus, who directed the first two films, has questioned the need to start over when the movies remain hugely popular.
Then there’s J.K. Rowling. Her comments on transgender rights since 2020 have divided fans and strained relationships with the original cast. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint have publicly distanced themselves from her, while Rowling has continued to court controversy.
Most recently, she mocked Watson’s interview and wrote on X, “Like other people who’ve never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.” The remark reignited debate over whether Warner Bros. can ever truly separate the franchise from its creator.
By reissuing the film that launched the phenomenon and building a new one for HBO, Warner Bros. is betting audiences are ready to embrace Harry Potter’s past and future at the same time. Whether that gamble pays off — or exposes the series’ growing fault lines — will become clearer as the 25th anniversary approaches.
How do you feel about Warner Bros. rebooting Harry Potter?