Ex-Disney Executive’s Alleged Scheme to Steal From Widow Shocks Industry
In the world of high-profile figures, scandals and legal battles often make headlines, especially when they involve names that have a significant place in pop culture history. The world of entertainment has seen its fair share of intrigue, but a recent case involving a former Disney executive has shocked many.
The case revolves around an inheritance dispute that has taken a rather unexpected turn, with accusations of fraudulent actions following the untimely death of celebrity chef Michael Chiarello.
Related: Superior Court Judge Denies Disney’s Legal Request as Lawsuit Unfolds
While many might expect a peaceful passing of a legacy, the reality is often far more complex. Following the death of Chiarello in 2023, his widow, Eileen Gordon, has found herself fighting not only with grief but also in a battle to protect her late husband’s legacy and secure his estate for their family. But what she didn’t expect was to be caught in a legal web spun by those she trusted most.
The case involves several key players, with former Disney executive Richard Frank, a former president of Disney Studios, at the center of the storm. Frank, who had enjoyed a long and successful career in the entertainment industry, is accused of using his influence and position to manipulate and take control of valuable assets that rightfully belong to Chiarello’s widow and children.
Related: Donald Trump Applauds Former Disney Exec for Opposing “Woke Donald Duck”
A “Malicious Plan” Unfolds
According to an exclusive report by The New York Post, Eileen Gordon has filed a lawsuit against Richard Frank, hospitality entrepreneur John Hansen, and consultant John Crowley. The lawsuit accuses these men of plotting to “defraud the estate, seize assets and eliminate any association with Chef Chiarello, his estate, his family or his legacy.”
Ms. Gordon expressed the heartbreak of discovering that the men she had once trusted were allegedly plotting to steal from her family during a time of immense loss. As she revealed to The Post, “Yet the people he trusted took everything for themselves, depriving all other shareholders including Chef Chiarello’s children.”
Chiarello, known for his acclaimed restaurants, including Bottega in Napa Valley, Ottimo Yountville, and Coqueta in San Francisco, passed away suddenly in 2023 from anaphylaxis. His untimely death left a void not just in the culinary world but in the lives of his family.
Related: Disney Blasts YouTube for Stealing Top Executive in Shocking Lawsuit
Gordon, as the trustee of Chiarello’s estate, was left with the responsibility of handling the estate’s future.
However, what followed after his death was far from expected. Instead of a smooth transition of the business interests and property, Gordon alleges that Frank, Hansen, and Crowley took immediate control of the family’s assets, including the three restaurants.
The Lawsuit Takes Shape
The legal battle came to a head in February 2024, when Gordon received a letter from Frank, Hansen, and Crowley proposing a “hostile takeover” of the restaurants. The lawsuit claims that the men were attempting to finalize the takeover in a way that would leave the Chiarello estate with nothing.
Related: Disney Settles Major Lawsuit After Tragic Death of Longtime Employee
The heart of the dispute lies in the ownership of the Bottega restaurant. The lawsuit claims that a crucial option for the estate to claim ownership of Bottega had expired, but the paperwork for this transaction was allegedly withheld by the investors. This move allegedly deprived Gordon and the estate of their rights to the restaurant.
A critical part of the plan, according to the suit, involved falsified financial documents that allowed the defendants to acquire Chiarello’s assets at “rock bottom” prices. They allegedly told Gordon that once the deal was completed, she and the estate would be left with nothing.
Despite these claims, Frank and Hansen’s legal teams have denied any wrongdoing, asserting that they were merely exercising their rights as part owners of the restaurants. According to the defense, they did nothing wrong in securing their share of the assets.
But Gordon has not backed down. She claims that the entire transaction was conducted in bad faith and that it caused substantial harm to the estate’s value. This is why she is seeking unspecified damages, which could increase significantly due to what she describes as the “malicious and fraudulent” actions of Frank, Hansen, and Crowley.
“Hostile Takeover” and Arbitration
The situation escalated when the matter went to arbitration in 2025. The arbitrator sided with Frank and Hansen, granting them ownership of Bottega and the intellectual property (IP) associated with Chiarello’s restaurants. This includes the trademarks, menus, concepts, and recipes developed by the chef.
However, Gordon’s legal team has argued that the intellectual property was never transferred to the restaurant LLC governed by the arbitration, and that it rightfully belongs to her. She claims that the transfer of Bottega’s ownership and intellectual property has severely impacted the estate’s value and is the result of a fraudulent scheme orchestrated by the defendants.
Related: Marvel, ‘Game of Thrones’ Star Wins Injury Lawsuit Against The Walt Disney Company
Chef Chiarello’s death in 2023, at the age of 61, added an even deeper layer of tragedy to this already complex situation. Though he and Gordon had filed for divorce in 2019, the paperwork was never finalized before his passing, leaving the estate in a complicated position.
Gordon is now left to pick up the pieces of her late husband’s legacy and fight to protect his memory and assets for the sake of their son. With the legal proceedings ongoing, the situation remains fluid, and both sides appear poised to continue battling it out in court.
Do you believe Frank and his co-defendants are guilty of manipulating the situation for their benefit? Or do you think Gordon is attempting to reclaim what she believes is rightfully hers? We want to hear your thoughts. Do you think justice will be served in this case? Drop your comments below and join the conversation.
