A new legal battle is born.
Related: Disney Faces Backlash After Charlie Kirk Controversy—Millions Cancel Films, Park Trips
Morgan & Morgan recently stepped into the legal arena with a bold lawsuit against The Walt Disney Company concerning the infamous Steamboat Willie. This lawsuit requests a judicial ruling to recognize the law firm’s use of the cartoon as fair use.
The crux of the case lies in whether the planned advertisement featuring characters that look remarkably like Mickey and Minnie Mouse infringes on Disney’s trademark protections.
The legal basis for Morgan & Morgan’s fair use claim stems from the idea that their advertisement isn’t merely a reproduction of Disney’s characters but instead offers satire and commentary within a comedic framework. In its legal argument, the firm hopes to clarify the boundaries of trademark rights as they apply to characters that are now considered part of the public domain.
Related: EPCOT’s 2025 Candlelight Processional Celebrity Lineup Has Some Surprising Names
Steamboat Willie holds a special place in cinematic history, having been released in 1928 as one of the first synchronized sound cartoons.
The short film introduced audiences to Mickey Mouse and, alongside its innovative animation techniques, has become a hallmark of American filmmaking. Over the years, it not only solidified the reputation of Disney as a pioneer in animation but also established a cultural phenomenon that endures to this day.
As of January 1, 2024, Steamboat Willie entered the public domain after 95 years of copyright protection. This transition allowed for new interpretations and adaptations that weren’t previously possible without Disney‘s consent.
However, the company has stated that the newer incarnations of the character, which remain under copyright protection, will continue to be aggressively defended.
Disney’s stance reflects its ongoing commitment to protecting its intellectual properties, emphasizing that while the original Steamboat Willie may be in the public domain, much of its brand and character rights remain firmly under the company’s control.
Before launching the lawsuit, representatives from Morgan & Morgan attempted to engage in discussions with Disney to ascertain the possibility of running their planned advertisement without incurring legal wrath. The advertisement in question depicted a humorous collision between Mickey’s boat and a car driven by Minnie, with the narrative suggesting that Minnie hires the law firm for legal representation against Mickey.
Despite the law firm’s outreach, concerns lingered about potential trademark infringement, leading to the decision to seek a declaratory judgment from the court. This move aims not only to clear the air for Morgan & Morgan’s advertisement but also to establish a legal precedent regarding fair use that could impact all who wish to explore creative interpretations of public domain characters.
In addition to Morgan & Morgan’s lawsuit, Disney’s previous legal history regarding Mickey Mouse highlights its protective stance on all derivative works and merchandise associated with the character. Recently, Disney filed a lawsuit against a company selling unlicensed Mickey Mouse products, illustrating the company’s active efforts to maintain control over its intellectual property.
